|
Post by Thumper on Jun 10, 2009 21:06:52 GMT -5
To keep this clear so there are no arguments, here is the BC Policy on re-applicants.
1. A person who has left ONCE before may re-apply to join. - If this person has left more than once, they stand a VERY slim chance of re-acceptance for a third term. 2. The Re-applicant's application will be voted on by myself and the Co-leaders. - Voting to rejoin is seriously considered. Criterion to determine whether or not they'll be accepted include: Previous contributions to BC, each leader's previous encounters with this person, how this person left BC, what they did outside of BC, their new application, and more. 3. IF a re-applicant is accepted back, this person will NOT be eligible to receive any powers within the clan. - However, this person should by NO means be treated differently than any other member. If the leaders accept them as a member, so should everyone else. 4. If a re-applicant is accepted back, they must begin their tenure process over. That means that if they would have been a Veteran on re-acceptance, they must start as a member for 12 months again (Recruit process may still be skipped).
|
|
|
Post by bond007 on Jun 10, 2009 22:27:28 GMT -5
Dang this is a great policy
|
|
|
Post by Bourne on Jun 10, 2009 22:50:25 GMT -5
thumper ftw
|
|
|
Post by [F0X]Col. Blake on Jun 11, 2009 8:54:06 GMT -5
Thumper, u r so awsomely intelligent. What would we do without you. "Thumper-like intelligence" FTW!
|
|
|
Post by Nitro on Jun 11, 2009 15:31:18 GMT -5
Very strong policy, but I believe if a re-applicant is accepted, they should be put on some kind of probation or demerit for leaving the clan and breaking their word on their loyalty towards Bravo Company.
|
|
|
Post by shotgunbob on Jun 12, 2009 17:01:06 GMT -5
Thumper may I ask why my message to returning members has been unstickied?
|
|
|
Post by bond007 on Jun 13, 2009 19:24:30 GMT -5
Very strong policy, but I believe if a re-applicant is accepted, they should be put on some kind of probation or demerit for leaving the clan and breaking their word on their loyalty towards Bravo Company. Their punishment is being ineligible for promotions.
|
|
|
Post by eK1m on Jun 13, 2009 19:43:58 GMT -5
yea wat bond said other wise it would be like u r not accepting them by labeling them lol
|
|
Narb
Non-Member
Proud former Blazerz leader
Posts: 248
|
Post by Narb on Jun 19, 2009 0:06:12 GMT -5
Awww lol, now I know that if I ever come back Ill never get my DoW lol. Ah well I tried
|
|
|
Post by surfnbird on Jun 20, 2009 12:30:09 GMT -5
Narb stold me he never coming back (D)
|
|
|
Post by Hawk on Jun 20, 2009 16:16:03 GMT -5
Narb stold me he never coming back (D) LOL ppl say things they dont mean all the time........kinda like the re-apps that said they would never leave
|
|
|
Post by Imposter on Jun 24, 2009 22:50:36 GMT -5
I dont like the fact they cant get power it should go more by time!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Hawk on Jun 25, 2009 17:04:27 GMT -5
I dont like the fact they cant get power it should go more by time!!!! well there should be some type of "restraint" on ppl who leave and come back........maybe make some ppl think before they leave
|
|
|
Post by Tommaco on Jun 25, 2009 17:54:22 GMT -5
i say no one can return once left
|
|
|
Post by Toms Old Friend on Jul 1, 2009 11:12:01 GMT -5
what if he was an old friend?
|
|