Post by account_disabled on Mar 12, 2024 0:39:06 GMT -5
In his opinion, “ the problem has been generated at the mortgage level because the Government did not dictate the appropriate regulations and as much litigation as there is now would have been avoided. The bank plays with the fact that there are many of its clients who do not complain, this is what happened with the issue of preferred ones, which only 40% claimed. The Supreme Court, due to the blocking of the CGPJ and its renewal, is in the picture, and the solution will take time to reach this problem but it should be proposed through a legislative reform that would annul this mortgage index.The contribution for part-time work will be equal to that for full-time work starting in October
Starting next October 1, part-time work will be equated with full-time work for the purposes of calculating the contribution periods with which retirement pensions, permanent or Email Data temporary disability, birth or care of a minor will be calculated. .
This is warned by the Professor at the University of Valencia and Labor Counsel at Alenttaa Abogados, Daniel Toscani, pointing to Royal Decree-Law 2/2023 published in the Official State Gazette on March 16. “What is done is to change article 247 of the General Social Security Law to adapt the rule to the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights and that of the Constitutional Court,” explains Toscani to Economist & Jurist .
These are two judicial pronouncements from 2019. On May 8 of that year, the CJEU stated, responding to preliminary questions from the Superior Court of Justice of Castilla y León, that Spanish legislation could give rise to indirect discrimination based on sex. , contrary to the Directive on the principle of equal treatment, since 75% of part-time workers are women. As Toscani himself contemplated in an article in 2019, the CJEU showed that the national provisions that are the subject of controversy have, in most cases, unfavorable effects for part-time workers compared to full-time workers. “ The CJEU concluded that additionally applying a partiality coefficient relative to part-time work goes beyond what is necessary to achieve said objective and represents, for this group of workers, a higher retirement pension amount than that which would result solely from taking taking into consideration their work day.”
Starting next October 1, part-time work will be equated with full-time work for the purposes of calculating the contribution periods with which retirement pensions, permanent or Email Data temporary disability, birth or care of a minor will be calculated. .
This is warned by the Professor at the University of Valencia and Labor Counsel at Alenttaa Abogados, Daniel Toscani, pointing to Royal Decree-Law 2/2023 published in the Official State Gazette on March 16. “What is done is to change article 247 of the General Social Security Law to adapt the rule to the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights and that of the Constitutional Court,” explains Toscani to Economist & Jurist .
These are two judicial pronouncements from 2019. On May 8 of that year, the CJEU stated, responding to preliminary questions from the Superior Court of Justice of Castilla y León, that Spanish legislation could give rise to indirect discrimination based on sex. , contrary to the Directive on the principle of equal treatment, since 75% of part-time workers are women. As Toscani himself contemplated in an article in 2019, the CJEU showed that the national provisions that are the subject of controversy have, in most cases, unfavorable effects for part-time workers compared to full-time workers. “ The CJEU concluded that additionally applying a partiality coefficient relative to part-time work goes beyond what is necessary to achieve said objective and represents, for this group of workers, a higher retirement pension amount than that which would result solely from taking taking into consideration their work day.”